author | Alan Dipert
<alan@dipert.org> 2020-02-22 07:25:23 UTC |
committer | Alan Dipert
<alan@dipert.org> 2020-02-22 07:25:23 UTC |
parent | 83bbb69d67d75b7add33f522906719f5f43a52a0 |
paper/jacl-els-2020.tex | +6 | -1 |
diff --git a/paper/jacl-els-2020.tex b/paper/jacl-els-2020.tex index fce4dea..3cd5f50 100644 --- a/paper/jacl-els-2020.tex +++ b/paper/jacl-els-2020.tex @@ -512,6 +512,8 @@ code into approximately\footnote{Actual JSCL output is not used code that would obscure the relevant machinery.} the following JavaScript: +\newpage + \begin{verbatim} function Jump(id, label) { this.id = id; @@ -566,6 +568,8 @@ Google Chrome \ref{appendix:benchmarks} show it runs several orders of magnitude faster than the previous, unoptimized version, and is nearly as fast as the JavaScript statement \texttt{while(X--)}: +\newpage + \begin{verbatim} var X = 10; var label = 0; @@ -695,7 +699,8 @@ beautiful wife, Sandra Dipert, for her skillful editing. \label{appendix:benchmarks} The following benchmark code was run on Google Chrome 80.0.3987.116, -on Linux, using a computer with an Intel i7-3520M CPU. +on Linux, using a computer with an Intel i7-3520M CPU. Times are in +milliseconds. \begin{verbatim} function Jump(id, label) {