git » homepage.git » master » tree

[master] / archive / forums / hacker-news / raw / items / 1142656.json

{"by":"edw519","id":1142656,"kids":[1143138,1143187,1143089,1142669,1142823,1142938],"parent":1142398,"text":"I was recently contacted by a head hunter for a job I thought was worth investigating.  I wanted to talk to the company directly, but the head hunter made it clear that Step 1 was <i>always</i> a web-based programming aptitude test, no matter who you were.  20 questions.  18 correct was considered passing.  They would only talk to candidates who got 19 or 20 correct.<p>So I took the test and got 20 correct (as I imagine many people here would do as well).  I thought it was very easy.  The headhunter later told me that in 9 months, she had sent 52 people to the test, only 2 of us got 19, and I was the only one who got 20.<p>I'm not really sure what this means.  That there are a lot of posers out there?  That she wasn't very good at screening talent?  That the companies seeking the best talent gladly pay $100 50 times to save their time?<p>I guess my biggest feeling is one of disappointment.  It's just not that hard to become a good enough programmer to get 20 right every time.  All it takes is study, passion, a lot of dedication, and a lot of hard work.  I wish more people would do that.  There aren't enough of us.","time":1266848158,"type":"comment"}